Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dmitry Mintz's avatar

By Article 20 of China's foreign trade law, the commerce ministry spokesperson's background answer on this revision says, the State Council's competent foreign-trade department, together with other relevant departments of the State Council, draws up, adjusts and publishes the catalogue of technologies whose export is prohibited or restricted. Since 2001, the answer adds, the commerce ministry, together with the science and technology ministry, has adjusted and revised that catalogue many times, and this has already formed a working practice.

The answer's words for those adjustments are entries and exits, control and release. It calls this revision routine work of technology trade management, carried out according to law and regulation and not aimed at any particular country, region or entity.

A later answer, on whether the revision gives enough consideration to industry development, numbers three respects in which it says that consideration shows. The third is dynamic adjustment: the commerce ministry and the science and technology ministry will adjust the catalogue's scope of management according to law and, in line with how technology develops, promptly move technologies that are not advanced, or that lag, out of the catalogue.

Going Global with Panda's avatar

The distinction between restricted technology transfer and serving customers through APIs, apps or SaaS is the part that matters most for companies selling overseas. If the final text keeps that carve-out, the practical go-global risk shifts from export licensing to buyer trust: data residency, compliance questions and where inference actually runs. Have you seen any early signals of how overseas enterprise customers are reacting to the draft?

No posts

Ready for more?